Comparison

Glattice vs Notion

Notion is a workspace: documents, wikis, databases, and a board view over those databases. Glattice is not trying to be that — it is a board, with two axes instead of one and a public API that its own interface is built on. If your boards live inside a larger body of documents, Notion’s integration of the two is genuinely hard to beat. If the board itself is the work, a second axis and a real API matter more than the wiki around them.

The short version

Notion and Glattice compared across six dimensions
DimensionNotionGlattice
Board structureOne axis, with sub-grouping available as a display setting.Two axes. Any facet on the rows, any other on the columns.
Changing the questionChange the group-by; it is a view configuration rather than an axis swap.Swap the axes in one click; the same cards re-sort.
Public APIPublic API, rate-limited, with a documented lag behind the UI’s capabilities.REST, 76 documented endpoints, not tier-gated.
AI agentsOfficial MCP server, scoped to Notion’s API surface.Remote MCP server over OAuth 2.1; agents read and write the same board.
Change historyPage history and version restore.Append-only, tagged with the interface behind each change. 30 days on Free.
SeatsEvery member with edit access is a paid seat.Viewers and billing-only members are free; you pay for people who edit.
Entry priceFree tier; paid from around $10/user/month.Free for 5 boards per space; Pro $5/month.

Where Notion is strong

A comparison that concedes nothing is not worth reading, so here is the honest read on where Notion earns its place — and where the two of us are simply built for different jobs.

  • Documents, wikis and databases in one place. If your boards live inside a larger body of writing, that integration is genuinely hard to beat.
  • Relations and rollups between databases, and a template community large enough that someone has usually built what you need.
  • A general-purpose workspace: one tool for notes, specs, boards and the wiki around them.

Where Glattice is different

Two things. The board is the product rather than a view over a database, so the second axis is a first-class property you can swap rather than a group-by setting — and dragging across a row boundary reliably sets both fields. And the API is not a companion to the interface, it IS the interface: a lint rule and a CI check ban the Glattice web app from touching the database directly, so anything you can do in the browser is by construction something an API client or an MCP agent can do.

Moving from Notion

Export a Notion database as CSV and import it. You choose which two columns become the axes; the rest can stay as additional facets or as card content. Export back out to JSON or CSV whenever you like, on any plan.

Keep reading

What is a 2D kanban board?Browse the templatesSee pricing

Frequently Asked Questions

No, and it does not try to be. Notion is documents plus databases plus boards. Glattice is a board. People who move tend to keep their docs where they are and move the boards, usually because they wanted two axes or a real API.

Export it as CSV and import it. You map one column to the rows and one to the columns; other columns can become additional facets.

If the board is a view over a body of documents, Notion. If the board IS the work — and you want two axes you can swap and an API your own tooling can rely on — this. Most people who move keep their docs where they are.