Comparison

Glattice vs Jira

Jira is the most configurable issue tracker in existence, and swimlanes mean its boards genuinely are two-dimensional. The trade is administration: getting there means schemes, screens, workflows and permissions, usually maintained by someone whose job that is. Glattice gives you the second axis without the apparatus — any facet on either axis, swapped in one click — and gives up the workflow engine, the sprint machinery and the enterprise governance to do it.

The short version

Jira and Glattice compared across six dimensions
DimensionJiraGlattice
Board structureColumns plus swimlanes; the swimlane field is configured per board.Two axes. Any facet on the rows, any other on the columns.
Changing the questionReconfigure the board; swimlane and column fields are not interchangeable in one action.Swap the axes in one click; the same cards re-sort.
Public APIExtensive REST API and a large marketplace.REST, 76 documented endpoints, not tier-gated.
AI agentsRovo and Atlassian’s own AI surface; MCP support via Atlassian’s connectors.Remote MCP server over OAuth 2.1; agents read and write the same board.
Change historyFull issue history and audit log.Append-only, tagged with the interface behind each change. 30 days on Free.
SeatsEvery user is a paid seat above the free tier.Viewers and billing-only members are free; you pay for people who edit.
Entry priceFree up to 10 users; paid from around $8/user/month.Free for 5 boards per space; Pro $5/month.

Where Jira is strong

A comparison that concedes nothing is not worth reading, so here is the honest read on where Jira earns its place — and where the two of us are simply built for different jobs.

  • A real workflow engine — transitions, conditions, validators — and the agile reporting apparatus around sprints, points and releases.
  • Enterprise governance: SSO, audit logs, data residency, and a marketplace of thousands of apps.
  • Deep configurability for organisations that have someone whose job is to configure it.

Where Glattice is different

Configuration cost, and what the axes are for. In Jira the second dimension is a board setting; in Glattice both axes are facets and either can be exchanged for another in one click, so the board is a lens rather than a configuration. The other difference is who the API is for: Glattice’s own interface runs on its public REST API with direct database access banned in CI, and its MCP server is a thin adapter over that same API — so an agent is a first-class user rather than an integration with a subset of the features.

Moving from Jira

Export issues from Jira as CSV and import them, mapping two columns to the axes. Titles, descriptions and whichever two fields you choose as axes come across, and everything you import can be exported again as JSON or CSV on any plan — including Free.

Keep reading

What is a 2D kanban board?Browse the templatesSee pricing

Frequently Asked Questions

If you depend on workflow transitions, sprint reporting or enterprise governance, Jira — it is built for exactly that and does it thoroughly. If what you want is the second dimension without the schemes, screens and permissions apparatus that getting there requires, this.

Through Jira’s CSV export. Titles, descriptions and any two fields you choose as axes come across. Workflow configuration does not.

If you depend on workflow transitions, sprint reporting or enterprise governance, Jira, and it is not close. If you want the second dimension without the schemes, screens and permissions apparatus that Jira makes you build to get it, this.